Come gather 'round, people...
Jun. 22nd, 2006 06:17 amSo, it looks like Iraq was known to have WMDs since at least sometime in 2003. The various senators, etc, who were claiming that none had been found stand exposed as partisan liars, or at any rate, bigger partisan liars than one would ordinarily expect senators to be.
*****
Congress may finally gut the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The times, they are a'changing. >:)
*****
It looks as well like the Senate's amnesty program has pretty much lost its magic smoke.
*****
It's exciting to live in times when major, long-term sociopolitical changes are actually taking place. The last time this happened was in the mid 60s, and I was really too young then to understand and appreciate what was going on.
*****
Baboons with flags.
*****
Congress may finally gut the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The times, they are a'changing. >:)
*****
It looks as well like the Senate's amnesty program has pretty much lost its magic smoke.
*****
It's exciting to live in times when major, long-term sociopolitical changes are actually taking place. The last time this happened was in the mid 60s, and I was really too young then to understand and appreciate what was going on.
*****
Baboons with flags.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 10:54 am (UTC)Reading that document, it says to me 'We found a large amount of degraded (ie, useless) weapons stock. Despite our many efforts to find and destroy further stocks of working weapons, we have been unable to find any. Therefore they must exist, and are a threat.'
The entirity of this intelegence report is speculation, excepting the first point that they had found a relativly low amount of degraded weapon stock that they already knew about. Note, there is a wide margin of fudging available to someone writing these reports. There were sealed and guarded stockpiles of UN confiscated weapons within Iraq. Sadam had no access to them, and *prior* to the US invasion they were well guarded. After the US invasion however...
You really should have learnt not to trust 'intelegence reports' offered for political consumption. Especialy when it's as shallow as a one page summary.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 12:32 pm (UTC)And it's sad immigration has to be such a sensitive issue. Of course, that's probably because there are about 11 million living here, which makes me wonder how they managed to get away with it for so long...
Not the weapons you went to war for
Date: 2006-06-22 08:07 pm (UTC)If they were usable, they'd be live, as opposed to degraded.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 02:03 am (UTC)The report also doesn't imply that they'd been unable to find further stocks of working weapons. What it says is, "We have found X number of munitions. We assess that Iraq had Y number of munitions that we should have found. Therefore we presume that Y-X munitions still exist out there somewhere."
And then the report speculates that terrorists might want to get the ones we haven't found yet, and use them to do bad things. Purely speculation, sure, but I don't find it hard to stretch the imagination to believe that.
None of which changes the fact that yes, this is simply a little tidbit of political food to toss into the frenzy. The Mainstream Media is breathlessly reporting this as if it were some kind of sudden, surprising news, but we've been hearing about chemical weapons in Iraq for years. Those that have already been paying attention have nothing to gain from this report, and everyone else either isn't paying attention, or wouldn't believe it regardless.
So what's the point? To give bureaucrats something else to blather on about. That is, with few exceptions, all they're really good at.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 04:23 am (UTC)A quick reverse lookup on the fax number shows it is in Washington DC, but it is a cell phone (registered to Verizon).
no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 08:48 am (UTC)Intelegence officials rebuke claims in the document.
Whoops. Looks like this is going to be a nasty back fire for the guys who released this 'intelegence document'.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 08:51 am (UTC)I happen to support the US troops. I happen to have several good friends in the US military. I don't think they should have been sent to Iraq, and I don't belive that Bush is the great military leader he claims to be.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 08:53 am (UTC)This is all starting to look like the slow stumbling decline of the GOP as a functioning political entity.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 12:44 pm (UTC)Dick Cheney - Deferred from military service during Veitnam "because service would cause hardship upon his family".
Donald Rumsfeld - Spent Vietnam as a reservist flight instructor. No other military experience.
Condoleezza Rice - No military service.
Michael Chertoff - No military service.
John Negroponte - No military service.
Andrew Card - No military service.
Joshua B. Bolten - No military service.
Karl Rove - Defered his draft in Vietnam by taking a part time course at college. No military service.
Joe Hagin - No military service.
Harriet Miers - No military service.
In fact, the only people with significant military experience, and in positions to influence the president, appear to have been Tom "Duct Tape" Ridge in his short post as head of HLS, and Colin "Hard, Solid, Evidence" Powell who has pretty much admited he had little to no influence on the opinions of his president.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-24 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-24 03:35 am (UTC)