Al Gore and 'Global Warming'
Jun. 1st, 2006 01:19 amNobody is interested in solutions if they don't think there's a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous (global warming) is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are... -Al Gore
So, even Al Gore admits that his movie about 'global warming' is untrue. He just needed to scare people so he could sell 'solutions'. It's interesting to see politics reduced to its most basic, cynical form: a would-be Gore administration, sold just like some new miracle product to solve a problem the advertiser made up.
*****
Who said it: Al Gore or the Unabomber? I got 25% correct.
*****
Ah, Vengeance... :)
So, even Al Gore admits that his movie about 'global warming' is untrue. He just needed to scare people so he could sell 'solutions'. It's interesting to see politics reduced to its most basic, cynical form: a would-be Gore administration, sold just like some new miracle product to solve a problem the advertiser made up.
*****
Who said it: Al Gore or the Unabomber? I got 25% correct.
*****
Ah, Vengeance... :)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 08:02 am (UTC)I got 58% on the quiz myself but I suspect 58% of that 58% was luck. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 08:48 am (UTC)That's what just completely wrecks my brain. He's admitting flat-out that there's no real problem, so he has to exaggerate because otherwise no-one will be interested in solving the non-problem. I don't think he sees anything dishonest or cynical about it, either. He wants us to follow the One True Path, and to him that's self-justifying. He's fine with saying that, because it seems to him a perfectly good, rational strategy that anyone should understand.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 09:20 am (UTC)Er... Unless you read a different quote where he *actualy said that*, then he isn't.
He's saying there is a problem, and you need to keep over-representing the side that say there is a problem to get past inertia and those who foster it. This is, in fact, the way that it's *always* been done, he's just saying so.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 09:39 am (UTC)No disagreement from me there! :D
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 09:17 am (UTC)Here he's saying that if you have a magazine, and get ten articles on global warming, and twenty on kudzu vines, then you should over-represent the global warming articles. He's *not* saying you should fudge the figures *in* those articles.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 11:40 am (UTC)You're living in that bubble of unreality he mentioned.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 04:38 pm (UTC)Actually, same as you. 25% ;-)
Neither one sounds like I'd expect them to, though I haven't read much from either.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 02:36 pm (UTC)I haven't seen the film, so can't make a detailed assessment of my own... but I think, as do frankly the great (and still growing) majority of climate scientists outside your own country's increasingly bizarre "bubble", that this is the single most important threat to our planet and way of life, far more so even than terrorism - and that yes, it is mostly human-induced.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 03:25 pm (UTC)What Al Gore is saying is propaganda is good!
Oh, and I got 67% correct.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 03:27 pm (UTC)In other words, its okay to make a mountain out of a molehill if you believe it's actually a mountain.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-01 04:04 pm (UTC)