Open Letter
Sep. 24th, 2008 11:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Sent earlier tonight:
Dear [Brown, Voinovich, Tiberi, Paulsen, W];
I'm writing to express my strong opposition to the bank bailout plan as currently structured. If the taxpayers are to pay to save investment banks from failure, then the taxpayers should end up owning those banks that we have saved. The current situation was a foreseeable outcome of high-risk lending practices. Rewarding those practices by saving the fortunes and reputations of those responsible only invites more of the same.
There's rather more I'd like to have said (and rather more rhetorical drama I'd like to have used in saying it), but I'm a believer in keeping these things short and polite, as they're more likely to be read.
The more I dwell on this, the worse it pisses me off. I can't believe they want to just bail the banks out without claiming ownership of them in the process. A token punishment like 'salary caps' doesn't even begin to fill the bill. These people made incredibly bad decisions, and no reasonable settlement can leave the same executives in control of the banks. Not do I like Paulsen's idea of block buying to shore up the share prices. It was brave and noble when JP Morgan did it with his own money in 1929 - it's robbing Peter to pay Paul when you do it with taxpayers' money.
Dear [Brown, Voinovich, Tiberi, Paulsen, W];
I'm writing to express my strong opposition to the bank bailout plan as currently structured. If the taxpayers are to pay to save investment banks from failure, then the taxpayers should end up owning those banks that we have saved. The current situation was a foreseeable outcome of high-risk lending practices. Rewarding those practices by saving the fortunes and reputations of those responsible only invites more of the same.
There's rather more I'd like to have said (and rather more rhetorical drama I'd like to have used in saying it), but I'm a believer in keeping these things short and polite, as they're more likely to be read.
The more I dwell on this, the worse it pisses me off. I can't believe they want to just bail the banks out without claiming ownership of them in the process. A token punishment like 'salary caps' doesn't even begin to fill the bill. These people made incredibly bad decisions, and no reasonable settlement can leave the same executives in control of the banks. Not do I like Paulsen's idea of block buying to shore up the share prices. It was brave and noble when JP Morgan did it with his own money in 1929 - it's robbing Peter to pay Paul when you do it with taxpayers' money.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:21 pm (UTC)Did you see mcains interview on cbs last night? He says the government needs to quit lying to the public about us heading for a recession. Because he feels we are heading for a depression instead. could be saying it to get more votes too. But still, scarey.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 06:38 pm (UTC)In the UK we did, eventually, nationalise Northern Rock. So far it seems to have been the right decision, but time will tell.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-26 12:12 am (UTC)